Porsche 911 Carrera Review

Robert Farago
by Robert Farago

Sports car drivers are fetishists. Where a normal person looks at the new Porsche 911 Carrera's front end and sees a pair of headlights, an enthusiast instantly discovers that The Sultans of Stuttgart have ditched the "fried egg" shape of the previous 911's illumination, and returned to the old air-cooled car's circular headlamps. Porsche-philes will also clock the subtly reshaped nose, and the new, tidier headlight spritzers. It's sad, but the 911 does that to people. The Carrera is one of those rare machines that can turn a disinterested driver into a raving car nerd.

It's not about looks. The appeal of the 911's gently evolving design is more or less lost on the non-cognoscenti. There's no question that this, the latest 911 iteration, is more attractive than the one it replaces, even if it's difficult to identify the exact cause (the smart money is on the wasp-waisted flanks and purposeful rump). Still, as beautiful as it is, the revised shape is no radical departure, no newfound siren song to lure converts into the 911 fold. No; the essence of the Carrera's transformative powers lies behind the wheel.

Don't take me literally. Much ink has been spilled on the interior of the latest Carrera (codenamed 997), especially in comparison to the previous car (codenamed 996). While the 997's cabin certainly boasts a more upmarket, more horizontal leather dash; some clever cupholders, a bit more Bose boom and vastly improved buttonology, the $70k Carrera still can't quite shrug off its utilitarian roots. In fact, for any driver with their adrenal glands intact, the only improvement worth savoring is the new shift knob. Like the mechanicals to which it connects, it's the sexiest non-human entity on the planet.

For those of you who "get it" (i.e. have already driven a Porsche Carrera), it's important to note straight away that the 997's engine and road-going dynamics do not represent a significant departure from those of the 996. The 997 simply offers more of the same, only better: faster, sharper, stronger and louder. As the Porsche PR dudes say, the diamond's been polished. For you, my Carrera-loving compatriots, that says it all. For others, a little explanation is in order…

The Porsche 911 is known as the "everyday supercar"– which is a bit like saying "my wife the supermodel". The 997 Porsche Carrera remains the fastest car a reasonably competent amateur driver can pilot at extra-legal velocities, on any road, in any weather, day or night, without significant risk of breaking down, hitting a solid object and/or killing him or herself– excepting the Carrera S. Even better, unlike the fantasy spouse, the Porker will also serve you breakfast, take care of the kids and pick-up the dry cleaning. In other words, it will potter about town or crawl through traffic jams without complaint.

Actually, I lie. As my Porsche service advisor pointed out, the 997 marks a return to the Carrera's hooligan roots. Maybe it's the additional low-down grunt, or the [always] welcome increase in the car's stupendous braking power, or the extra extra-prodigious grip, or the way shifting gears feels like pulling a hot wire through cold cheddar, or the raspier induction snort and more aggressive engine note. No matter how you look at it, the 997 wants to party. Hard. And because it's safe to do so, to not do so seems, well, churlish.

Let me put it this way. In the 996, you occasionally give it some to catch up with traffic ahead. There's a bit of a lag, and away you go. In the 997, you always give it some, wherever and whenever you can, there's no lag whatsoever (just ever-increasing levels of shove) and away you go. When you drop the hammer, jink around slower cars or simply change lanes, driving the 997 is like dicing with bi-planes in a military jet.

Bottom line: the 997 is a superb driver's car for people who don't want to die. It's better than the 996, but not so much better it would make a 996 driver want to sell their soul to make the swap. Rent, maybe. The new 997 Carrera is also a good old fashioned license loser. (Notice I'm already in denial; blaming the car, not the driver.) Right. Now that that's established, go and test drive one, come back, and join me in a fetishistic examination of the car's minute flaws. Ready?

The Carrera should have a memory seat with electric forwards and backwards seat adjustment as standard. The sat nav should admit that Lincoln, Rhode Island exists, and be ready, willing and able plot a course to my choice of destination in that municipality. The horn needs some serious steroids; it shouldn't sound like a clown's boutounniere. Other than that, the Porsche 997 Carrera is perfect.

Robert Farago
Robert Farago

More by Robert Farago

Comments
Join the conversation
  • Ajla The market for sedans is weaker than it once was but I think some of you are way overstating the situation and I disagree that the sales numbers show sedans are some niche thing that full line manufacturers should ignore. There are still a sizeable amount of sales. This isn't sports car volume. So far this year the Camry and Civic are selling in the top 10, with the Corolla in 11 and the Accord, Sentra, and Model 3 in the top 20. And sedan volume is off it's nadir from a few years ago with many showing decent growth over the last two years, growth that is outpacing utilities. Cancelling all sedans now seems more of an error than back when Ford did it.
  • Duties The U.S . would have enough energy to satisfy our needs and export energy if JoeBama hadn’t singlehandedly shut down U.S. energy exploration and production. Furthermore, at current rates of consumption, the U.S. has over two centuries of crude oil, https://justthenews.com/politics-policy/energy/exclusive-current-rates-consumption-us-has-more-two-centuries-oil-report.Imagine we lived in a world where all cars were EV's. And then along comes a new invention: the Internal Combustion Engine.Think how well they would sell. A vehicle HALF the weight, HALF the price that would cause only a quarter of the damage to the road. A vehicle that could be refueled in 1/10th the time, with a range of 4 times the distance in all weather conditions. One that does not rely on the environmentally damaging use of non-renewable rare earth elements to power it, and uses far less steel and other materials. A vehicle that could carry and tow far heavier loads. And is less likely to explode in your garage in the middle of the night and burn down your house with you in it. And ran on an energy source that is readily extracted with hundreds of years known supply.Just think how excited people would be for such technology. It would sell like hot cakes, with no tax credits! Whaddaya think? I'd buy one.
  • 3SpeedAutomatic I just road in a rental Malibu this past week. Interior was a bit plasticity, but, well built.Only issue was how “low” the seat was in relation to the ground. I had to crawl “down” into the seat. Also, windscreen was at 65 degree angle which invited multiple reflections. Just to hack off the EPA, how about a boxy design like Hyundai is doing with some of its SUVs. 🚙 Raise the seat one or two inches and raise the roof line accordingly. Would be a hit with the Uber and Lyft crowd as well as some taxi service.🚗 🚗🚗
  • Dartdude Having the queen of nothing as the head of Dodge is a recipe for disaster. She hasn't done anything with Chrysler for 4 years, May as well fold up Chrysler and Dodge.
  • Pau65792686 I think there is a need for more sedans. Some people would rather drive a car over SUV’s or CUV’s. If Honda and Toyota can do it why not American brands. We need more affordable sedans.
Next