BMW Raising Prices on American-made SUVs in China, Willing to Absorb Some Tariff Costs

Matt Posky
by Matt Posky

BMW says it will hike the price of two utility vehicles in China to cope with the additional cost of tariffs on U.S. car imports in the world’s biggest vehicle market. The models are the X5 and X6, both manufactured in South Carolina.

This news comes after China increased import duties on all automobiles from the United States to 40 percent earlier this month. China had previously said it would reduce its already high vehicle tariffs across the board as a sign of good faith — which it did, while simultaneously slapping new punitive tariffs on the U.S. Meanwhile, President Donald Trump has postponed prospective automotive tariffs while negotiations take place with Europe.

If you needed proof that a trade war is on and were wondering how automakers would handle it, look no further. BMW says it will have to raise the models’ Chinese MSRP by 4 percent to 7 percent. It’s a relatively modest increase considering how utterly massive the new import fees are, which indicates a willingness from the automaker to absorb some of the associated costs just to remain in the market. It’s something BMW is not alone in doing, and there could be a valuable lesson to be learned from that.

“BMW stands for free [trade] but can’t stand still without taking actions to respond to the market changes,” a BMW spokeswoman explained to Reuters.

The actions taken by the German manufacturer appear to involve doing whatever it takes not to lose out on occupying the world’s largest automotive market. Keep in mind that practically every automaker under the sun complained to the United States that the mere prospect of tariffs would induce price increases, layoffs, and reduced investments. The rhetoric against China has not followed the same path.

Ford has already stated it will not increase prices in Asia, as it doesn’t want to further hamper its ability to do business there. General Motors, which builds and sells a large number of vehicles in China already, claims it’s assessing the potential impact of all trade actions and proposals but has made no decisions as of yet. Fiat Chrysler is doing the same.

However, Reuters found that Mercedes-Benz increased pricing on its American-made crossovers this month. Chinese dealers claim the GLE, which is shipped over from Alabama, had undergone a moderate increase in price. Mercedes boss Dieter Zetsche said last Thursday that Daimler is already looking at ways to mitigate the impact of the trade war. Possible solutions include shipping some U.S. production to China.

It’s almost like the auto tariffs from China are working in its favor. This begs the question as to whether or not the United States should just bite the bullet and pull the trigger on the fresh duties Trump is threatening. Granted, China has framed the automotive import fees against the U.S. as a retaliatory measure, but neither side is innocent.

The People’s Republic imposed draconian rules on foreign automakers (and other industries) for years while the Western World assumed it would someday meet them in the middle. That’s not how things played out. Instead, China has been so wildly shrewd that it managed to amass a ludicrous amount of wealth and bargaining power. Now it’s throwing Europe a bone while telling the United States to go kick rocks.

Frankly, it’s rather impressive what China managed to achieve. But it appears to have been at the expense of the United States, with no clear solution in sight. Presumably, if automakers are willing to cave in order to continue operating in the Chinese market, they would do the same for the United States. But to what degree is the real question, as the United States is not a growth market. China has far more citizens, and a greater number of them become car owners every year.

Matt Posky
Matt Posky

A staunch consumer advocate tracking industry trends and regulation. Before joining TTAC, Matt spent a decade working for marketing and research firms based in NYC. Clients included several of the world’s largest automakers, global tire brands, and aftermarket part suppliers. Dissatisfied with the corporate world and resentful of having to wear suits everyday, he pivoted to writing about cars. Since then, that man has become an ardent supporter of the right-to-repair movement, been interviewed on the auto industry by national radio broadcasts, driven more rental cars than anyone ever should, participated in amateur rallying events, and received the requisite minimum training as sanctioned by the SCCA. Handy with a wrench, Matt grew up surrounded by Detroit auto workers and managed to get a pizza delivery job before he was legally eligible. He later found himself driving box trucks through Manhattan, guaranteeing future sympathy for actual truckers. He continues to conduct research pertaining to the automotive sector as an independent contractor and has since moved back to his native Michigan, closer to where the cars are born. A contrarian, Matt claims to prefer understeer — stating that front and all-wheel drive vehicles cater best to his driving style.

More by Matt Posky

Comments
Join the conversation
3 of 13 comments
  • Sub-600 Sub-600 on Jul 30, 2018

    This article is raw meat for Chicken Tax Dundee.

  • El scotto El scotto on Jul 30, 2018

    "If they aren’t molesting little children on CSPAN". Has TTAC lost all sense of dignity? I realize that the overweight, seldom-laid white guys think this a place to air their political griefs/views but that comment was waaaaaay over the line. Kyree or Adam; what say you?

  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
Next