Sergio Doesn't Know What to Do With the Dodge Grand Caravan

Steph Willems
by Steph Willems

(Update: A previous version of this story stated that the Honda Odyssey was the top-selling minivan in the U.S. in 2016. The number one spot actually goes to the Toyota Sienna.)

After being granted a stay of execution, the Dodge Grand Caravan’s hazy, undefined lifespan remains a controversial topic in Auburn Hills.

The Moses of minivans continues to trundle off Fiat Chrysler Automobiles’ Windsor, Ontario assembly line, alongside its far-more-advanced Chrysler Pacifica stablemate. Compared to the tech-laden Pacifica, the venerable Grand Caravan offers an acceptable level of content at a lower price point, and its reprieve was in keeping with FCA’s tendency to keep money-making models around for extended periods of time. Together, the two models span the segment’s price range.

The unavoidable question for FCA is: how long can the Grand Caravan stay in the lineup?

“That is the point of heated debate on the inside of FCA,” said FCA CEO Sergio Marchionne during a media conference at the North American International Auto Show. “When we shut production of the Grand Caravan is not clear to us yet.”

In November, a letter sent from a parts supplier to Canadian autoworkers union Unifor stated that the end of the line for the aging model will come in July 2019. A crossover would replace the Grand Caravan, the letter said.

Marchionne claimed that rumors claiming FCA would begin phasing out the model this year are absolutely not true, before adding — maddeningly — “probably not.”

Rather than being handed a death notice in 2016, the Grand Caravan ended the year as the second-highest-selling minivan on the U.S. market, losing to the Toyota Sienna by a margin of only 113 units. With 127,678 units sold in the U.S. last year, the model topped its 2015 tally by over 25 percent. North of the border, the Grand Caravan remains enormously popular, with 51,513 units sold in 2016.

The biggest attraction to keeping the Grand Caravan around, besides its continued popularity, is the older model’s much lower entry price. While the Pacifica has enjoyed glowing praise, the all-new platform and high level of technology warrants a premium sticker price, potentially leaving childbearing millennials out in the cold. Only the base Pacifica retails for under $30,000, with upper trim lines pushing past the $40,000 mark. The Grand Caravan, however, stickers for $23,595, usually with a pile of manufacturer cash on the hood driving the price below $20,000.

For FCA, filling a gap with a very old product suits the company just fine.

When asked about the gulf between the two minivans, and the argument that Pacifica sales could be affected by the model’s price, Marchionne wasn’t condemning anyone or anything.

“We had the same story with the Grand Cherokee back in (2010),” said Marchionne. “It took us about 12 months to get geared up. It has received more awards than any minivan I’ve heard of. It’s a lot more expensive than the outgoing vehicle. We know that from a quality standpoint and what it offers the marketplace, there’s no better. Give us some time — I think we need to take out the imports and place the Pacifica at the top of the list.”

Marchionne did say the automaker needs to look at the Pacifica’s price range.

FCA needs “to offer some level of affordable access to the Pacifica at the low-end,” he said, adding that the same pricing issue arises with most new models.

“The Grand Caravan has got limitations — it’s very old architecture.”

[Image: Fiat Chrysler Automobiles]

Steph Willems
Steph Willems

More by Steph Willems

Comments
Join the conversation
2 of 105 comments
  • FusilliJerry FusilliJerry on Jan 12, 2017

    I always thought the GC could use an SRT6 version.

  • Akear Akear on Jan 29, 2017

    Sergio is the Roger Smith of this era. It is not going to end well for him. I almost feel sorry for this egomaniac.

  • Urlik You missed the point. The Feds haven’t changed child labor laws so it is still illegal under Federal law. No state has changed their law so that it goes against a Federal child labor hazardous order like working in a slaughter house either.
  • Plaincraig 1975 Mercury Cougar with the 460 four barrel. My dad bought it new and removed all the pollution control stuff and did a lot of upgrades to the engine (450hp). I got to use it from 1986 to 1991 when I got my Eclipse GSX. The payments and insurance for a 3000GT were going to be too much. No tickets no accidents so far in my many years and miles.My sister learned on a 76 LTD with the 350 two barrel then a Ford Escort but she has tickets (speeding but she has contacts so they get dismissed or fine and no points) and accidents (none her fault)
  • Namesakeone If I were the parent of a teenage daughter, I would want her in an H1 Hummer. It would be big enough to protect her in a crash, too big for her to afford the fuel (and thus keep her home), big enough to intimidate her in a parallel-parking situation (and thus keep her home), and the transmission tunnel would prevent backseat sex.If I were the parent of a teenage son, I would want him to have, for his first wheeled transportation...a ride-on lawnmower. For obvious reasons.
  • ToolGuy If I were a teen under the tutelage of one of the B&B, I think it would make perfect sense to jump straight into one of those "forever cars"... see then I could drive it forever and not have to worry about ever replacing it. This plan seems flawless, doesn't it?
  • Rover Sig A short cab pickup truck, F150 or C/K-1500 or Ram, preferably a 6 cyl. These have no room for more than one or two passengers (USAA stats show biggest factor in teenage accidents is a vehicle full of kids) and no back seat (common sense tells you what back seats are used for). In a full-size pickup truck, the inevitable teenage accident is more survivable. Second choice would be an old full-size car, but these have all but disappeared from the used car lots. The "cute small car" is a death trap.
Next